Sagar KC on Saying No to Email Automation (When It Hurts More Than It Helps)
Automation is helpful until it isn’t.
Most people add automation to look efficient. But bad automation wastes time and kills trust. I’ve seen brands lose thousands trying to save seconds.
Here’s what I’ve learned from saying no to automation when it didn’t make sense.
1. Not everything should be automated
Just because something can be automated doesn’t mean it should be.
Some brands send automated replies to real customer complaints. That’s lazy. It makes people feel ignored. I’d rather reply late than send a fake answer right away.
2. Good automation feels invisible
If your automation feels robotic, it’s not helping. The best automation is silent. It runs in the background and supports the real work.
For example, sending a welcome email when someone signs up is smart. But sending a full 7-email sequence without checking results? That’s noise.
3. Context matters more than scale
Automation is meant to save time at scale. But when you’re small, it can do more harm than good.
I’ve worked with small stores that automated their entire customer journey. It felt cold. Sales dropped. We removed the bots and added personal replies. Results improved.
People still want to talk to people.
4. You can’t automate care
Customers know when something is real. They know when it’s not.
A birthday email that says “Happy Birthday!” with no name or offer does nothing. A manual email with their name and a small bonus builds loyalty.
Automation should support care. It should not replace it.
5. Start manual, then automate what repeats
This is my rule.
Do it by hand first. Learn what works. Then automate parts that repeat and don’t lose meaning.
Automation is not a shortcut. It’s a support tool.
Automation works best when it saves time without losing the human touch. The moment it feels forced, fake, or lazy, it’s better to stop.
Sometimes, the best way to scale is to stay human.
Read more at sagarkc.com